What is 802.11ac Wi-Fi, and How Much Faster than 802.11n is It?

Written by prodigitalweb

Faster Wi-Fi Performance – 802.11ac Appropriate Choice

We all tend to desire faster Wi-Fi and it is something made available at times at a price. However it is not about fast Internet speeds to and from your service provider but about transfer of files between devices in the home or office, streaming video from network-attached drive to a TV and gaming with the possibilities of lowest network expectancies.If one intends to have a faster Wi-Fi performance, 802.11ac would be the appropriate choice. 802.11ac is said to be an amplified version of 802.11n which is said to be dozens of times quicker, delivering speeds that tends to range from 433 Mbps up to several gigabits per second.

In order to accomplish the type of quantity, 802.11ac tends to work solely in the 5GHz band, utilising plenty of bandwidth, which operate in up to eight spatial streams – MIMO, and engages a type of technology known as beamforming that sends signal to the client devices directly. If one has been utilising an 802.11n router or an older 802.11b/g model such as the perennial favourite Linksys WRT54G and intends upgrading to 802.11ac, you would need some information as follows:

How 802.11ac seems to function

Some years ago, 802.11n had introduced some stimulating technology which had brought about great speed improvements over 802.11b and g. 802.11ac tends to do something akin to 802.11n.

For instance 802.11n seems to supports four spatial streams – 4×4 MIMO, and a channel width of 40 MHz. However 802.11ac can use eight spatial streams with channels up to 80 MHz wide that can then be shared to make 160 MHz channels. Although everything tends to be the same, it would mean that 802.11ac has 8x160MHz of spectral bandwidth to play with versus 4x40MHz.

This is a big difference that permits it to congest huge amount of data through the airwaves. In order to enhance the quantity further, 802.11ac tend to introduce 256-QAM modulation to around 64-QAM in 802.11n, which congests 256 various signals on the same frequency through shifting and twisting into a slightly diverse phase.

In theory, it magnifies the spectral competence of 802,11ac over 802.11n. Spectral competence tends to measure how sound a given wireless procedure or multiplexing systems tends to utilise the bandwidth accessible to it.

Introduce Standardized Beamforming

In the case of case of 5GHz band, where the channels seem to be equally wide – 20MHz+, spectral competence is not so important. Though in cellular bands, channels seem to be often only 5MHz wide which makes the spectral efficiency very significant.

802.11ac also tends to introduce standardized beamforming which transmits radio signals in a way which is directed at a precise device. This could increase the overall quantity as well as make it more reliable, reducing power consumption.

Beamforming could be done with smart antennae which could physically move to track a device or modulate the amplitude and together with the phase of the signals to detrimentally hinder with each other leaving only a narrow, interference-free beam.

The older 802.11n tends to utilise the second system that could be implemented by routers as well as mobile devices. Eventually, 802.11ac, like 802.11 varieties before it, is said to be fully backwardscompatible, one could purchase an 802.11ac router and it could work well with the older 802.11n and 802.11g Wi-Fi devices.

The Speed – 802.11ac

On the 5GHz band, utilising beamforming 802.11ac should have similar or improved range than 802.11n, without beamforming. Due to less penetration power, the 5GHz band does not have the same range as 2.4GHz.

However it is the trade-off which needs to be made. In the extremely over worked 2.4GHz, there is no adequate spectral bandwidth to permit gigabit level speeds for 802.11ac. While your router is well placed or you tend to have numerous routers, it would not matter much.

The most essential factor would be the broadcast power as well as the antenna quality of the devices. With regards to speed, there are two answers, the theoretical maximum speed which can be attained in the lab and the practical maximum speed one is most likely to receive at home in the real world with plenty of signal weakening obstacles.

The theoretical maximum speed of it is said to be eight 160MHz 256-QAM channels where each of them seem to have the ability of 866.7Mbps, for a total of 6,933Mbps which is a transfer rate of around 900 megabytes per second, more than one could squash down a SATA 3 link. In circumstances where one does not need the maximum performance and the consistency of wired gigabit Ethernet yet a good choice for situation needing the highest performance, 802.11ac could be compelling.

Rather than strewing the living room on running an Ethernet cable to the home theatre PC under the TV, 802.11ac can now have adequate bandwidth to stream the highest definition content to your game console, set top box or home theatre PC, wirelessly. 802.11ac is said to be a viable alternative to Ethernet for all but the most demanding use cases.


About the author